skip navigation


Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Did you mean metric?

Your query medtronic returned 8 results.

1000 ELI LILLY & CO. V. MEDTRONIC, INC., 496 U.S. 661 (1990)
[Syllabus]
1000 MEDTRONIC, INC. V. LOHR ET VIR, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).
[Syllabus]
1000 RIEGEL V. MEDTRONIC, INC.
[Syllabus]
1000 RIEGEL V. MEDTRONIC, INC.
[Syllabus]
934 ELI LILLY & CO. V. MEDTRONIC, INC., 496 U.S. 661 (1990)
[Syllabus]
934 MEDTRONIC, INC. V. LOHR ET VIR, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).
[Syllabus]
377 BUCKMAN CO. V. PLAINTIFFS’ LEGAL COMM.
[Syllabus]
Whether federal law preempts state-law tort claims alleging fraud on the Food and Drug Administration during the regulatory process for marketing clearance applicable to certain devices.
238 MERCK KGAA V. INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES I, LTD.
[Syllabus]
238 BATES V. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
[Syllabus]
238
[Syllabus]
238 COLUMBUS V. OURS GARAGE & WRECKERSERVICE, INC.
[Syllabus]
49 U. S. C. §14501(c)(2)(A)-which excepts "the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles" from §14501(c)(1)'s general rule preempting prescriptions by "a State [or] political subdivision of a State . . . related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property"-does not bar a State from delegating to municipalities and other local units the State's authority to establish safety regulations governing motor carriers of property, including tow trucks.