skip navigation


Search the opinions of the US Supreme Court

Search for:
All decisions
Only decisions since 1991
Only summaries of decisions
Only historic decisions
use and, or, not -- and is default
* acts as wildcard, phrases in "double quotes"

Did you mean Lucas and coastal?

Your query lucas and coastal returned 4 results.

1000 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[Opinion]
974 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[Dissent]
961 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[Dissent]
929 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[Syllabus]
920 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[Concurrence]
910 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
[]
865 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).
[Syllabus]
1000 LUCAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992).
[Syllabus]
641 PALAZZOLO V. RHODE ISLAND
[Syllabus]
Petitioner's claim that Rhode Island's application of its wetlands regulations took his property without compensation in violation of the Takings Clause is ripe for review and is not barred by his acquisition of title after the regulations' effective date; however, he failed to establish a deprivation of all economic use, for the parcel retains significant development value.
499 TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC. V.TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
[Syllabus]
Two moratoria on development that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency imposed while formulating a comprehensive land-use plan for the Lake Tahoe Basin did not constitute per se takings of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause.
445 LINGLE V. CHEVRON U.S. A. INC.
[Syllabus]